Bluff or Double Bluff

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/middle_east/syria-says-us-led-coalition-fired-missiles-on-its-positions/2018/12/02/557e2274-f678-11e8-8642-c9718a256cbd_story.html?utm_term=.dd37ab1b0c97

http://www.atimes.com/article/syria-coalition-targets-isis-leader-linked-to-executions/

The Syrian state news claims the US-Coalition attacked Syrian military locations in the eastern part of the state. However, there is not confirmation from the coalition yet. In a different article, which came shortly after the first, the anti-ISIS coalition headed by the US claimed to have killed the leader of an ISIS cell responsible for the death of an American citizen in 2013. The types of “strikes” described in both situations have striking similarities. The neither location is specifically disclosed so it is not possible to confirm if they are the same attack interpreted differently. Though I suspect they may be correlated. 

In either case, there is specific US-coalition action. This may be demonstrating how the US is trying to make itself relevant in Syria. It must be cautious not to reopen wounds by attacking the Syrian government forces. Though, in this case, it may be the Syrian army trying to provoke a response from its powerful ally Russia to pressure the US to get out of Syria entirely. This would be in the interest of President Assad. By focusing attention on the successful elimination of an ISIS leader who killed an American soldier, the US can divert attention from the Syrian Civil War, in which it has been unsuccessful and relatively powerless, to the “war on terror.”  It is possible that both are using the same event for their own domestic propaganda. The security concerns for the government of Syria may include that the US will use its war against ISIS to target regime forces. For the US, it has little security concern in this situation, however, justice for its service members is still in of interest to the American people. 

 

-Anna K.

President Trump Speaks on the Use of Tear Gas

Activist and reporter have been commenting and question the use of tear gas on the Central American Caravan members that are now as the US Mexico boarder near California. BBC reported on the recent comments President Donald Trump made in Mississippi about the recent military retaliation for attempted illegal boarder crossing. President Trump is characterizing the tear gas as being “very safe” and a “very minor form of tear gas”. The presidents comments are contrary to the reaction of the migrants who saw many children pass out and many being unable to breath. For the President, the presence of children at the border seems to be incomprehensible. The President claims that adults with children are “grabbers” that picked up children in order to gain more leverage and ultimately a better outcome in their asylum plea. The Mexican Foreign Ministry is calling for a full investigation on the use of the tear gas by the US government. The images of the tear gas being released have been circulating and have prompted a lot of the domestic push back that we are currently seeing.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-46355258

Ayanna

Israel Releases PA Authority Governor of Jerusalem

Palestinian Authority’s Jerusalem Governor Adnan Gheith was released from jail on bail along with nine other members of the Fatah group. Israeli police arrested Gheith for the third time last month in Israel’s latest attempts to prevent the PA from carrying out political and security attacks within Israel despite a 1995 law that does so. Gheith is unable to leave the country or enter the West Bank over the course of the next six months.
The continued arrests of PA officials could deter future security and political PA attacks within Israel. However, this is probably unlikely as there is already a law to deter the attacks which clearly isn’t working and the arrests probably will not help prevent such attacks.

Aeriana
https://www.jpost.com/Arab-Israeli-Conflict/Report-Israel-releases-PA-Jerusalem-Governor-Adnan-Gheith-573336

Putin Calls Russia a “Major Guarantor” of Global Energy Security

At the end of last month, Russian President Putin to the United Nations Security Council that he considered Russia a “Major Guarantor” of Global Energy Security. This is based on Russia’s sizable exports of all main types of energy to the EU and Asian Pacific countries. The purpose of this statement was to ask the Security Council to better protect Russian energy companies around the world.

This statement comes after the United States banned the sale of advanced oil drilling technology to Russia. The larger tensions between the United States and Russia in recent years has continually poured into the energy security world and this is one of the affected issues.

Read More: https://sputniknews.com/russia/201811291070254147-putin-global-energy-security/

–John Reinboldt, 12/1/2018

Ukraine cites massive buildup of Russian forces along its border

President Poroshenko of Ukraine claimed that Russia is building up its forces along their shared border. Tensions have been very high between two nations, since the seizure of three Ukrainian navy ships in the sea of Azov. President of Ukraine said that there are currently more than 80,000 troops, 1,400 artillery and multiple rocket launch systems, 900 tanks, 2,300 armed combat vehicles, 500 aircraft and 300 helicopters along deployed by Russia along the border. These numbers add up to the whole force of Russian Western Military District. Although, these numbers have not been independently verified. Ukraine implemented martial law in 10 out of its 17 districts. Russian men aged 16 to 60 are not allowed to enter Ukraine, while any foreigners are forbidden from entering Crimea from the Ukrainian side of the border.

The Ukrainian conflict is enduring an increased amount of tension, since it began in 2014. The number of Russian forces along the border, if true, is incredible, which should raise some alarm within Ukraine’s Western partners, including the United States. Although, at the same time, Ukraine has implemented martial law and ordered its military to be at full military readiness, which can be seen as a threat. While, some Russian citizens have been refused entry into the country, just because they were Russian. This situation needs to be resolved diplomatically, because any wrong move or escalation could have some dire consequences. Ukraine has the right to defend its territory, but at the same time sending such strong and dangerous signals can be detrimental. Now is the time for all sides to get around a table and negotiate some kind of agreement to lower the tension in the region. Russia should release the Ukrainian sailors and its ships back to Ukraine as a diplomatic gesture.

-Yegor

https://www.foxnews.com/world/ukraine-cites-massive-buildup-of-russian-forces-along-border

US Moving out of Africa

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-46234122?intlink_from_url=https://www.bbc.com/news/topics/cnx753jejqwt/somalia&link_location=live-reporting-story

The United States armed forces are beginning to consider Rssia and China a larger threat to its security. Because of this, troops are being removed from Africa to prioritize other regions of the world. Around 700 troops will be removed from Africa and placed in different regions of the world. While 700 troops will be removed, there are currently 7,200 US troops throughout the African continent.

It is good the the United States is prioritizing troops in other regions of the world. In many cases, such as Somalia, the use of US troops have not resulted in any significant successes in conflicts. Instead, placing these troops in other regions may prove more beneficial to the promotion of other US interests.

Tim M.

Para Mi Familia, mi hijos

The Migrant caravan saga continues as people from Central America are have reached Mexico hoping to make it to America to plead asylum. This article provides updates on the realities of the migrants seeking asylum, specially following one man and his families journey from rural Guatemala. The story of the Baltazar family expands on the disconnect between the migrants and the US government.

Juarez is the town  many of the migrants have reached. As of now migrants in the area are receiving inked numbers on their arms to indicate where they are in the process of being called to review their asylum status. Many of the bridges have been closed in order to funnel migrants to one centralized spot for processing which according to the reporter can take days and even weeks. Many of the migrant that have been processed have be labeled as seeking economic asylum (essentially looking for better job opportunities) and this claim will most likely get them denied for their asylum claim.

President Trump maintains that the overwhelmed system is allowing in criminals is turning people away are the California boarder. In the other side many migrants like the Baltazar family, having no access to constant updates on the mandates of the presidency, The patriarch of the family stating that he  does not know what Donald Trump is saying about the migrant group or even know about the process itself. Written information is a challenge for the Baltzar family due to their literacy in both Spanish and english. The language barrier is an important obstacle that is contributing to the tensions as to understanding the migrant group and in turn discerning the voice of the President versus the requirements and protections under US law. The author also writes that while President Trump Strong rhetoric about the migrant group is out there, it is not stoping more migrants from moving north, with threat of violence and lack of job opportunities rising, all the families and individuals within the migrant caravan have is hope for an opportunity to plead their case.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-46133083?intlink_from_url=https://www.bbc.com/news/topics/crr7mlg0vr2t/mexico&link_location=live-reporting-story

Ayanna

Trump Uses Foreign Aid as a Bargaining Chip

With the approaching caravan of migrants along the southern U.S. border, Trump has continuously threatened cutting off the U.S. supply of foreign aid to several Central and South American countries if they do not aid the U.S. in stopping the caravan. With Trump’s administration, foreign aid and foreign assistance has been used as a bargaining chip to continuously look out for American interests on an international scale. There are several examples, such as U.S. foreign aid to Pakistan and other Middle East countries in return for intelligence about terrorist movements. Recently, the U.S. approach to foreign aid (which is typically used without expecting something in return) has become a transactional agreement between the U.S. and whoever is involved in the relationship, and is less based on humanitarian purposes.

Although this is not necessarily a threat to U.S. national security, it is impacting the way the U.S. interacts with the international community, and its authority on a global scale is being matched by other world powers, such as China, where foreign aid is not as transactional.

 

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/red-alert-politics/trumps-big-bargaining-chip-foreign-aid

The Food Part of Security-Mackenzie

https://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/opinion/columnists/iowa-view/2018/11/26/artificial-intelligence-agriculture-food-systems-tom-vilsack-ag-farm-tech-drone-ai-robots/2114073002/https://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/opinion/columnists/iowa-view/2018/11/26/artificial-intelligence-agriculture-food-systems-tom-vilsack-ag-farm-tech-drone-ai-robots/2114073002/

 

So this article provides an interesting perspective on the necessity of artificial intelligence in terms of the United State’s food production to prevent waste and food shortages.  It kind of alludes to it being a security crisis. The potential I see for this would be that in the event of a food shortage in other parts of the world which could in ways cause a security crisis in the sense that it could affect the safety of our allies as those states experiencing the shortages would begin to break down etc.  So what this is proposing is to prevent that it makes food production and distribution through artificial intelligence more effective.  Thereby preventing some sort of future crisis stemming from lack of food.

 

 

 

NATO-Ukraine Commission

Ukraine called for a meeting with NATO due to the Russian’s having seized by Ukrainian Ships and sailors recently. NATO has condemned this and called fro Russia to allow Ukraine to continue to have freedom of navigation in the sea of Azov and the Kerch Strait along with calling for the release of the prisoners and ships. The allies further condemned the Crimea annexation and claimed that Russia should leave. It was highlighted that the allies will continue to sanction Russia and Ukraine will be further reinforced both practically and politically.

 

It is highly possible that if Russia does not play this out carefully there could be dire consequences. While this will most likely not lead to war, it is possible that this will lead to an extreme escalation of the conflict and I am not sure this is a fight Russia can really take on effectively.  At the very least, it would not be surprisingly to see more NATO troops be stationed in Ukraine or at least more exercises such as the ones in Norway be under taken in the near future to try to force the point that NATO will be willing to fight Russia should they continue to be so aggressive in the region even if they may not be exactly true.

 

https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/opinions_160789.htm

 

Return top
 
css.php